Sacred Games Season 2

  • How Are Sartaj and Shahid Khan Related in Sacred Games? The Missing Partition Story Explained

    Spoiler Warning: This article contains major spoilers for the Season 2 finale of Netflix’s Sacred Games, including the identity of the nuclear bomb plotter and the family revelation involving Sartaj Singh.

    Sartaj Singh is trying to save Mumbai from a nuclear bomb.

    Shahid Khan is the man helping bring about its destruction.

    They appear to be enemies on opposite sides of a deadly conspiracy.

    But the final episode of Sacred Games reveals something neither man seems to understand.

    Sartaj Singh and Shahid Khan are cousins.

    Their mothers were sisters separated during the Partition of India in 1947.

    One sister remained with the family that crossed into India.

    The other was separated from them and grew up on the opposite side of the new border.

    Decades later, their sons find themselves connected to the same nuclear threat.

    One wants to stop it.

    The other helps make it happen.

    For many viewers, the revelation seemed to arrive almost without explanation.

    Why did the series suddenly introduce this family connection?

    What did the old photograph mean?

    And why did Sartaj never discover that the man he was pursuing was his own cousin?

    The answers reveal one of the most fascinating pieces of Sacred Games production history.

    The Partition story was originally planned as an entire episode. Most of it never made it into the finished series.

    That missing material explains why the family twist feels both meaningful and strangely incomplete.

    Are Sartaj Singh and Shahid Khan Really Cousins?

    Yes.

    Sartaj Singh and Shahid Khan are maternal cousins.

    Their mothers, Prabhjot and Navjeet, were sisters.

    Prabhjot became Sartaj’s mother.

    Navjeet became Shahid’s mother.

    The two women were separated during the violence and displacement surrounding the 1947 Partition of British India.

    The finale reveals this relationship through a flashback and a family photograph.

    The story does not require viewers to identify a secret marriage, hidden adoption, or an unknown father.

    The connection is much simpler.

    Their mothers are sisters, making Sartaj and Shahid first cousins.

    This is the essential answer to the question that has repeatedly appeared in fan discussions.

    But knowing the family relationship is only the beginning.

    The more important question is why the writers chose to connect a Sikh police officer trying to save Mumbai with a man participating in a nuclear attack against the city.

    Who Are Prabhjot and Navjeet in Sacred Games?

    Prabhjot is Sartaj Singh’s mother.

    Navjeet is Shahid Khan’s mother.

    Their shared childhood forms the foundation of the finale’s historical revelation.

    In the Partition flashback, a Sikh family is attempting to cross the border during the upheaval of 1947.

    The journey is interrupted by violence and separation.

    Navjeet is taken away from the family.

    Prabhjot continues with the relatives who reach India.

    The sisters grow up apart.

    Their lives follow different paths.

    Years later, the consequences of that separation become visible through their sons.

    Sartaj grows up in India and becomes a police officer.

    Shahid grows up connected to the family established across the border and eventually becomes involved in a conspiracy to destroy Mumbai.

    The two men do not appear to know about their shared ancestry.

    That ignorance is central to the irony.

    They are related by blood but divided by history, geography, and ideology.

    What Happened to Shahid Khan’s Mother During Partition?

    The finale’s flashback shows that Shahid’s future mother, Navjeet, was separated from her family during the violence of Partition.

    She was taken away while the rest of her family continued toward India.

    This is the event that places the sisters on opposite sides of the border.

    It is important to understand the historical context without reducing the scene to a simple family accident.

    In 1947, British India was divided into the newly independent states of India and Pakistan.

    The Partition triggered enormous population movements and widespread communal violence.

    Families were separated.

    People were displaced from their homes.

    Women and girls were particularly vulnerable to abduction and sexual violence.

    The story of Navjeet draws on that historical trauma.

    Her separation is not presented as a harmless misunderstanding.

    It is a violent rupture that permanently changes the family’s future.

    The series does not provide a complete account of everything that happens to her afterward.

    That missing history becomes particularly important when we consider what the writers originally planned.

    The Deleted Sacred Games Episode That Explains Everything

    One of the most revealing sources about this subplot is an August 2019 interview with Sacred Games head writer Varun Grover.

    Speaking to Gadgets 360, Grover explained that the Partition story was originally much larger.

    The writers planned to devote an entire episode to Prabhjot and Navjeet.

    It would have explored their separation during Partition and the family history that eventually connects Sartaj and Shahid.

    The episode was intended to appear in the middle of Season 2.

    Viewers would have followed the historical story without immediately understanding its connection to the main plot.

    Only later would they discover that the two girls were the mothers of Sartaj and Shahid.

    That structure would have transformed the finale’s revelation.

    Instead of introducing the relationship almost entirely at the end, the series would have given the audience time to become emotionally invested in the sisters.

    Their childhood separation would have become a story in its own right.

    The revelation that their sons were enemies would then carry much greater emotional weight.

    Why was the episode removed?

    Grover identified several practical obstacles.

    The production faced difficulties involving locations, scheduling, budget, and actor availability.

    Recreating a Punjab village during Partition proved especially challenging.

    The writers reduced the planned full episode to several shorter scenes.

    Those scenes were then reduced further.

    Eventually, the historical storyline survived primarily as the brief sequence in the finale.

    Grover explained that the team filmed the remaining material after much of the main production had already been completed.

    This matters because the family twist’s abruptness was not necessarily the original creative intention.

    The writers had planned a much more substantial setup.

    The finished series contains only a fragment of that larger story.

    Why Did Sartaj’s Mother Look at the Old Photograph?

    The photograph is the visual clue that connects the Partition flashback to the present.

    After the historical sequence, the finale shows Sartaj’s mother looking through old family photographs.

    The images connect her to the people shown during the Partition journey.

    That tells the audience the flashback was not an unrelated historical episode.

    It was her family’s history.

    Once viewers identify Navjeet as Shahid Khan’s mother, the connection becomes clear.

    The two mothers were sisters.

    Their sons are cousins.

    The photograph therefore performs a great deal of narrative work in a short amount of time.

    It establishes continuity between the two timelines.

    It identifies the family relationship.

    And it shows that the consequences of Partition are still present decades later.

    But the scene is easy to miss.

    The finale is simultaneously dealing with Gaitonde’s final days, Guruji’s conspiracy, Shahid’s nuclear device, and Sartaj’s desperate attempt to save Mumbai.

    The family photograph receives relatively little time.

    Viewers concentrating on the bomb may not immediately recognize the faces or understand their significance.

    That helps explain why so many people finished the series unsure about the relationship.

    Why Did Some Viewers Think Shahid’s Mother Was His Grandmother?

    A Reddit thread titled Can someone explain Sartaj-Shahid’s family? illustrates the confusion.

    The original poster initially believed that the older woman Shahid spoke to was his grandmother.

    That interpretation created an apparent age problem.

    If the women shown in the Partition flashback belonged to different generations, how could Sartaj and Shahid be roughly the same age?

    The poster later corrected the misunderstanding.

    The woman Shahid speaks to is his mother.

    Other commenters explained that the two mothers were sisters.

    This resolves the apparent contradiction.

    Navjeet and Prabhjot belong to the same generation.

    Their sons therefore belong to the same generation as well.

    There is no need for an elaborate family-tree theory.

    The confusion comes from how briefly the finale introduces the older woman and the Partition flashback.

    The family connection is straightforward once the identities are established.

    The presentation is what makes it difficult to follow.

    Did Sartaj Know Shahid Khan Was His Cousin?

    The series does not establish that Sartaj knew.

    The family connection is revealed to the audience through scenes involving the mothers and their shared history.

    It is not presented as a discovery that Sartaj clearly makes before the final confrontation.

    This distinction is important.

    Viewers possess information that the characters do not necessarily have.

    We can recognize the relationship because the episode shows both sides of the family story.

    Sartaj, however, is focused on preventing a nuclear attack.

    He does not have the same opportunity to connect the historical clues.

    There is no confirmed scene in which he identifies Shahid as his cousin and then deliberately chooses to conceal that knowledge.

    Nor is there a confirmed reconciliation between the two men.

    The revelation functions primarily as dramatic irony.

    The audience learns that the apparent enemies share a family history.

    The characters continue acting without that knowledge.

    Did Shahid Khan Know Sartaj Was His Cousin?

    There is also no clear evidence that Shahid knew.

    His involvement in the nuclear conspiracy is driven by the larger political and ideological plot.

    The series does not establish that he specifically targeted Sartaj because of their family connection.

    Nor does it show him discovering that the police officer trying to stop the bomb is his aunt’s son.

    That makes the relationship especially tragic.

    Shahid participates in a plan that could kill countless people in India.

    Among those people are members of his own extended family.

    He does not need to know that connection for the irony to matter.

    In fact, his ignorance makes the story more pointed.

    His hostility is directed toward a population he treats as an enemy.

    But the boundary between that population and his own family is not as clear as he believes.

    The family revelation challenges the simplicity of the divisions on which his actions depend.

    Why Did the Writers Make Sartaj and Shahid Related?

    The most convincing interpretation is that the relationship connects the contemporary conflict to the historical trauma of Partition.

    Sartaj and Shahid represent opposing sides of the nuclear conspiracy.

    One is trying to save Mumbai.

    The other helps place it in danger.

    Their mothers’ story reveals that the two men emerged from the same extended family.

    The border that separated the sisters eventually produced two very different lives.

    This does not mean Partition alone caused Shahid’s decisions.

    The series does not establish such a direct psychological explanation.

    Instead, the relationship works as a thematic contrast.

    Two cousins become enemies without knowing they are related.

    Their shared ancestry complicates the idea that national, religious, or political identities create completely separate groups of people.

    The connection is especially striking because the nuclear plot threatens mass destruction.

    Shahid’s actions could kill people who are connected to him through the very family history he may not fully understand.

    The man helping destroy Mumbai is unknowingly threatening his own blood relatives.

    That is the emotional irony the subplot introduces.

    Is the Family Twist a Plot Hole or a Deliberate Symbol?

    It is reasonable to see it as both a meaningful idea and an underdeveloped storyline.

    The family relationship itself is not a contradiction.

    The finale establishes how the mothers were separated and why their sons grew up in different circumstances.

    The problem is that the revelation has little direct effect on the immediate plot.

    Sartaj does not discover the relationship and reconsider his actions.

    Shahid does not learn that his opponent is a cousin.

    The family history does not provide the bomb’s deactivation code.

    And the two men do not share a final conversation about their past.

    For viewers expecting the revelation to change the events of the finale, it may feel unnecessary.

    That reaction appeared in Reddit discussions shortly after Season 2 was released.

    Some viewers questioned why the writers introduced the relationship if it did not lead to a confrontation or resolution.

    But Grover’s interview provides crucial context.

    The writers originally intended to tell a much fuller story about the sisters.

    The historical subplot was drastically reduced during production.

    That makes the finished twist easier to understand.

    It was designed as part of a larger narrative.

    When much of that narrative disappeared, the revelation remained without its intended development.

    The result is not necessarily a logical plot hole.

    It is an emotionally ambitious subplot that received too little screen time.

    Why Didn’t the Family Connection Help Sartaj Defuse the Bomb?

    This is an important distinction from the other mysteries surrounding the finale.

    Sartaj’s final attempt to stop the nuclear device involves the Kaal Granth and a pattern associated with his father, Dilbagh Singh.

    The Shahid-Sartaj family revelation does not establish the correct code.

    Nor does it show that Shahid deliberately selected a password connected to his cousin.

    Some viewers initially wondered whether the Partition story might contain a hidden clue to the bomb’s pattern.

    That would have connected the family revelation directly to the climax.

    But the series does not confirm such a connection.

    The two storylines operate on different levels.

    The Kaal Granth provides a possible practical solution to the bomb.

    The Partition flashback provides historical and thematic meaning to the conflict.

    Both involve Sartaj’s family.

    But they should not be treated as the same mystery.

    For a detailed examination of the final pattern and the writer’s possible fail-safe explanation, read:

    Why Did Sartaj Choose His Father’s Pattern in Sacred Games? The Secret Hidden in the Kaal Granth

    Did the Original Sacred Games Novel Include the Partition Story?

    Yes.

    The Partition narrative has roots in Vikram Chandra’s original novel, Sacred Games.

    In his interview, Varun Grover explained that the novel contains substantial self-contained stories within its larger narrative.

    One of them concerns Prabhjot and Navjeet.

    The writers wanted to preserve that material in the television adaptation.

    But translating a substantial literary backstory into an eight-episode television season proved difficult.

    The final version retains the essential family relationship without reproducing the full narrative.

    This is why the book is particularly relevant to understanding the subplot’s intended scope.

    The Partition material was not merely an improvised twist added to the television finale.

    It came from a larger story that the adaptation struggled to accommodate.

    However, the book should not be treated as an exact substitute for every detail of the Netflix series.

    The adaptation changes and compresses multiple storylines.

    Its final nuclear countdown also differs from the novel’s treatment of the larger threat.

    The most reliable conclusion is that the family history has literary roots, while the television version presents only a condensed portion of it.

    What Would the Missing Episode Have Changed?

    A full Partition episode could have changed the emotional impact of the entire finale.

    Imagine watching the two sisters as children.

    We would see their family before the separation.

    We would understand the circumstances of the journey.

    We would experience the moment Navjeet was taken away.

    And we would see the loss from Prabhjot’s perspective.

    Later, when the finale revealed the identities of their sons, the relationship would carry the weight of a story viewers already knew.

    Instead, the finished series asks the audience to absorb the historical tragedy and the family revelation almost simultaneously.

    That is a difficult task during an episode already dominated by a nuclear countdown.

    The missing episode might also have given more space to the long-term consequences of separation.

    How did each sister remember the other?

    Did they ever try to reconnect?

    What did their children know about the family history?

    Those are compelling questions.

    But the Netflix series does not answer them fully.

    We should not invent those missing scenes or assume the writers had resolved every detail.

    What Grover confirmed is the intended scale of the storyline.

    The full content of the unproduced episode is not available in the finished show.

    What Reddit Viewers Noticed About the Cousin Reveal

    The family connection has remained a subject of discussion well beyond the show’s original release.

    In December 2019, a Reddit user asked how Sartaj and Shahid could be related and whether the ages of their mothers made sense.

    The discussion clarified that the women were sisters.

    In February 2025, another viewer asked about the old family photograph shown in the final episode.

    The question focused on why the same people appeared in the Partition flashback and the present-day family album.

    The answer again pointed to the sisters’ separation.

    Other discussions questioned the narrative purpose of the revelation.

    Some viewers considered it an unnecessary addition because it did not affect the bomb’s outcome.

    Others saw it as commentary on the human consequences of Partition and the tragedy of relatives becoming enemies across national boundaries.

    These reactions reveal two distinct sources of confusion.

    The first is factual: viewers may not immediately understand the family tree.

    The second is narrative: even after understanding the relationship, viewers may wonder why it matters.

    The writer’s account of the deleted episode helps answer the second question.

    The story was supposed to matter much more visibly than the finished series allowed.

    The Deeper Meaning: A Border Divided One Family, Not Two Separate Worlds

    The most powerful aspect of the revelation is its refusal to treat India and Pakistan as entirely disconnected worlds.

    The two mothers began as members of the same family.

    Their separation was caused by a historical catastrophe.

    Their children grew up with different national identities and life experiences.

    By the time the events of Sacred Games unfold, those children are on opposite sides of a deadly conflict.

    The series uses their relationship to expose the human cost of treating national divisions as absolute.

    Shahid’s participation in a plan to destroy Mumbai is not made less serious because he is related to Sartaj.

    But the relationship makes the violence more tragic.

    The people threatened by the attack are not merely anonymous members of an opposing nation.

    Some are connected to Shahid through his own family’s past.

    This is the irony of the final revelation.

    The border divided the sisters.

    But it did not erase their relationship.

    Decades later, their sons remain cousins, whether they know it or not.

    Final Verdict: How Are Sartaj and Shahid Khan Related?

    Sartaj Singh and Shahid Khan are first cousins because their mothers, Prabhjot and Navjeet, were sisters separated during the 1947 Partition of India.

    Prabhjot became Sartaj’s mother in India.

    Navjeet became Shahid’s mother after being separated from her family.

    The Season 2 finale reveals the connection through a Partition flashback and an old family photograph.

    Neither Sartaj nor Shahid is clearly shown discovering the relationship.

    And the revelation does not directly determine whether Mumbai survives the nuclear attack.

    Its importance is historical and emotional.

    It connects the series’ contemporary conflict to the violence that divided families during Partition.

    It also reveals the tragic irony of two cousins standing on opposite sides of a plan for mass destruction.

    But there is an additional reason the twist feels unfinished.

    Writer Varun Grover confirmed that the sisters’ story was originally intended to fill an entire episode.

    Production difficulties reduced that storyline to a brief sequence.

    The family connection was never meant to be just a last-minute surprise. It was the surviving fragment of a much larger tragedy.

    And that missing story explains why one of Sacred Games‘ most powerful revelations also became one of its most confusing.


    Related Analysis on True Taste Korea

    1. Why Did Sartaj Choose His Father’s Pattern in Sacred Games? The Secret Hidden in the Kaal Granth

    Explore Dilbagh Singh’s connection to Guruji, the secret fail-safe theory, and why Sartaj’s final pattern may have been the key to saving Mumbai.

    2. Why Did the Scientist Guess the Bomb Code in Sacred Games? The Finale’s Most Frustrating Plot Hole

    Discover why the nuclear expert’s first two attempts frustrated viewers, how the five-pattern limit shaped the finale, and whether the scene’s logic holds up.


    Sources and Further Reading

    TTK Original — Beyond the Headlines

    Editorial note: The family relationship and Partition flashback are established in the Netflix series. The original plan for a full Partition episode, and the production difficulties that reduced it, were confirmed by writer Varun Grover in his 2019 interview. The discussion of the subplot’s thematic meaning is editorial interpretation.

  • Why Did the Scientist Guess the Bomb Code in Sacred Games? The Finale’s Most Frustrating Plot Hole

    Spoiler Warning: This article contains major spoilers for the Season 2 finale of Netflix’s Sacred Games, including the nuclear bomb sequence and Sartaj Singh’s final attempt to save Mumbai.

    Mumbai is minutes away from a nuclear catastrophe.

    A bomb has been activated. The man who knows how it works is no longer available to help. The authorities have only a handful of chances to enter the correct security pattern.

    And then something happens that has frustrated Sacred Games viewers for years.

    A nuclear expert begins drawing patterns on the device.

    The first attempt fails.

    She tries another.

    That fails too.

    Two of the five available attempts are gone before Sartaj Singh even begins examining the Kaal Granth for a possible solution.

    The scene raises an obvious question.

    Why would a trained expert risk two precious attempts on patterns that appear to have no established connection to the bomb?

    Was she following a technical procedure the audience never saw?

    Was she simply panicking?

    Or did the writers sacrifice logic to make Sartaj’s final decision more dramatic?

    The series never gives a definitive explanation for her choices.

    But the scene, the surrounding circumstances, and the unusually strong Reddit reaction allow us to examine what happened—and why the criticism has persisted.

    How Many Attempts Did They Have to Defuse the Bomb?

    The bomb’s security interface allows five attempts to enter the correct pattern.

    The authorities are operating under extreme time pressure.

    Shahid Khan has activated the device, and the countdown is approaching its end.

    The bomb cannot simply be switched off through an obvious control.

    The investigators need to enter a pattern into its security system.

    But they do not know which pattern is correct.

    A specialist approaches the device and makes two unsuccessful attempts.

    That leaves three.

    Sartaj subsequently uses the Kaal Granth, a book associated with Guruji’s religious movement, to identify possible codes.

    He tries two patterns without success.

    Only one attempt remains.

    With seconds left, he selects the pattern associated with his father, Dilbagh Singh.

    The series cuts to black before revealing whether the bomb has been disabled.

    This sequence makes the scientist’s earlier decisions especially important.

    Her two attempts represent 40% of the total opportunities available.

    Once those attempts are used, they cannot be recovered.

    And Sartaj ultimately needs every remaining chance to reach his final decision.

    Were the Scientist’s Patterns Really Random?

    This is the first distinction we need to make.

    The patterns appear arbitrary to the audience.

    But the show does not explicitly establish that the expert selected them through a random process.

    We do not hear a detailed explanation of her reasoning.

    We do not see her consulting a known list of likely codes.

    Nor does the episode clearly establish that she has recognized a specific feature of the device that justifies her choices.

    As a result, viewers understandably interpret the attempts as guesses.

    But “the show does not explain her reasoning” is more accurate than “the show proves she chose randomly.”

    That difference matters because one defense of the character is that she may have been trying patterns she considered plausible.

    Perhaps she recognized a common configuration.

    Perhaps she was testing an assumption about the interface.

    Perhaps she believed the chance of finding the code, however small, was worth taking.

    These are possible explanations.

    The problem is that the series does not provide evidence for any particular one.

    If the writers intended her to follow a professional method, the audience needed enough information to recognize it.

    Without that context, the scene looks like a specialist guessing at a password while the city faces destruction.

    Why Did Viewers Criticize the Nuclear Expert So Harshly?

    The reaction was not limited to a few isolated comments.

    After the Season 2 finale aired in August 2019, viewers repeatedly questioned the scientist’s behavior.

    In a Reddit thread titled Why people bashing/trolling nucler lady?, the original poster defended her.

    The argument was straightforward.

    She used only two of the five attempts.

    She might have selected patterns based on knowledge the audience did not possess.

    And at least she tried to stop the bomb.

    But other commenters strongly disagreed.

    They argued that a nuclear specialist should not use a limited number of attempts without an identifiable basis.

    One commenter pointed out that Sartaj would have had more chances to test patterns from the Kaal Granth if the earlier attempts had been preserved.

    Another questioned why the series did not show the expert explaining her choices if they were based on relevant technical knowledge.

    That last criticism is particularly strong.

    The scene does not need to provide a lengthy lesson in nuclear engineering.

    It only needs to establish that the specialist has a reason for entering those patterns.

    Without that explanation, the audience is left watching an expert make decisions that appear less careful than those of an ordinary person protecting a locked phone.

    The criticism also appeared in Indian entertainment coverage.

    Hindustan Times reported on viewers mocking the scene, while Gadgets 360 identified the two guesses as a significant weakness in the finale.

    The frustration was therefore not simply about an ambiguous ending.

    It was about the credibility of the steps leading to that ending.

    Why Would Anyone Guess a Code With Only Five Attempts?

    The strongest defense of the scientist is the extreme situation.

    The bomb is already counting down.

    The investigators lack the correct code.

    And the consequences of failure are catastrophic.

    Under those circumstances, doing nothing may feel impossible.

    Even a low-probability attempt could seem preferable to standing beside the device without acting.

    That emotional logic is understandable.

    But it creates a problem.

    An action is not automatically useful merely because the situation is desperate.

    If an incorrect input consumes a limited opportunity, every attempt has an opportunity cost.

    The question is not simply whether a guess might work.

    It is whether the guess is more valuable than preserving the attempt for information that might become available moments later.

    This is especially relevant because Sartaj eventually discovers a potential source of patterns in the Kaal Granth.

    The scientist does not know that solution is coming.

    Viewers do.

    Or, at least, viewers recognize its significance once Sartaj begins using the book.

    That creates retrospective frustration.

    The two attempts that seemed like desperate action now look like chances Sartaj could have used to test additional clues.

    Still, hindsight matters.

    The expert cannot make decisions using information she does not yet possess.

    Her real failure, if there is one, lies not in failing to predict Sartaj’s discovery but in using attempts without explaining or establishing a reasonable basis.

    Did the Scientist Know About the Kaal Granth?

    There is no clear indication that the scientist understood the significance of the Kaal Granth before Sartaj connected it to the bomb.

    The book is not a standard technical manual.

    It belongs to the mythology and organization of Guruji’s movement.

    Its pages contain patterns associated with members of the cult.

    Sartaj’s investigation gives him access to information the specialist does not necessarily have.

    He knows about Guruji.

    He has investigated Ganesh Gaitonde’s connection to the movement.

    He has discovered his father’s involvement.

    And he has access to the book.

    The scientist’s expertise concerns the immediate physical threat.

    Sartaj’s advantage concerns the people who created it.

    That is an important difference.

    A technical specialist can understand a device without knowing the intentions of the individuals who programmed it.

    A detective may know those individuals without understanding the device’s engineering.

    The finale brings those two kinds of knowledge together.

    But the scene also exposes a weakness in the team’s coordination.

    If Sartaj possesses a possible source of security patterns, why is that information not considered before the first attempts are used?

    The series does not fully resolve that question.

    And it may be a stronger criticism than simply calling the scientist incompetent.

    Was Sartaj Partly Responsible for the Wasted Attempts?

    This possibility is often overlooked.

    Viewers focus on the person physically entering the first two patterns.

    But the entire team is operating with incomplete information.

    Sartaj has been investigating the conspiracy surrounding Guruji and Gaitonde.

    He has knowledge of the cult’s symbols and relationships.

    Yet the connection between those symbols and the bomb is recognized only very late.

    From a storytelling perspective, the delay is necessary to create the final revelation.

    From an investigative perspective, it raises questions about information sharing.

    Could Sartaj have raised the possibility earlier?

    Could the team have examined the device’s interface before making any attempts?

    Could they have compared the security pattern with material recovered from Guruji’s organization?

    The episode does not provide enough information to answer these questions confidently.

    We should not assume that Sartaj already knew the Kaal Granth contained the solution.

    He appears to recognize the connection under pressure.

    But the broader criticism remains.

    The finale depends on vital information reaching the right person at the last possible moment.

    That can create compelling suspense.

    It can also make the characters appear less coordinated than the situation demands.

    Why Did Sartaj Try Batya’s and Trivedi’s Patterns?

    After taking over, Sartaj uses the Kaal Granth as a possible source of codes.

    He tests patterns associated with members of Guruji’s circle.

    The attempts involving Batya and Trivedi fail.

    This leaves the final opportunity.

    Sartaj must choose between the remaining possibilities, including the pattern associated with his father.

    His decisions differ from the scientist’s because he has a specific reason for considering those patterns.

    The book is linked to the organization behind the attack.

    The bomb requires a drawn pattern.

    And the Kaal Granth contains precisely such designs.

    That does not prove any particular pattern will work.

    But it gives Sartaj an identifiable hypothesis.

    The distinction is important.

    Both characters are entering codes without knowing the correct answer.

    Yet Sartaj’s choices are tied to evidence from the investigation.

    The scientist’s earlier choices are not explained in comparable detail.

    This difference is why viewers tend to accept Sartaj’s attempts more readily, even though they also fail.

    Why Didn’t They Try Dilbagh Singh’s Pattern First?

    Once the ending is revealed, it is tempting to ask why Sartaj did not immediately choose his father’s pattern.

    But the answer is not obvious before he makes the decision.

    The Kaal Granth contains several patterns.

    The show does not provide an explicit instruction identifying Dilbagh’s as the correct deactivation code.

    Sartaj has to interpret the book under extraordinary pressure.

    His father’s connection to Guruji is significant, but that does not automatically establish that his pattern will stop the bomb.

    The deeper explanation comes from writer Varun Grover’s discussion of the ending.

    Grover proposed a possible interpretation in which Dilbagh was the only follower who seriously questioned Guruji’s destructive plan.

    Under that interpretation, his pattern served as a secret fail-safe.

    It could stop the catastrophe if someone decided the plan should not proceed.

    But Grover also discussed a darker possible outcome in which Sartaj fails to save Mumbai.

    The finale never confirms that Dilbagh’s pattern works.

    So the scientist’s two lost attempts cannot be described as definitely preventing a successful disarmament.

    We do not know whether additional attempts would have changed the outcome.

    What we know is that they reduced the team’s options.

    For the complete explanation of Dilbagh’s pattern and Grover’s two possible endings, read:

    Why Did Sartaj Choose His Father’s Pattern in Sacred Games? The Secret Hidden in the Kaal Granth

    Why Did the Scientist Wear a Bulletproof Vest Near a Nuclear Bomb?

    Another detail attracted almost as much criticism as the pattern guessing.

    The specialist wears a bulletproof vest while working near the device.

    Some viewers mocked the image because a bulletproof vest would not protect someone from a nearby nuclear detonation.

    That observation is correct in a narrow sense.

    But it misses the immediate context.

    A gunfight has taken place near the bomb.

    Majid has been killed.

    The investigators cannot necessarily assume that the area is completely secure.

    A bulletproof vest is intended to reduce certain ballistic threats.

    It is not nuclear protection.

    In a separate Reddit discussion, viewers defended the vest on exactly those grounds.

    The expert could still face gunfire while working on the device.

    Removing protective equipment would not improve her ability to stop the countdown.

    This is an example where the criticism is less persuasive.

    The vest and the code attempts are different issues.

    Wearing ballistic protection in an area recently affected by gunfire has a plausible explanation.

    Using two limited security attempts without an established rationale is harder to defend.

    Treating both details as equally absurd obscures that distinction.

    Is the Bomb-Defusing Scene Realistic?

    The most important realism problem is not the precise shape of the patterns.

    It is the way the sequence compresses a catastrophic threat into a familiar password puzzle.

    The bomb’s interface resembles a smartphone-style pattern lock.

    The characters are allowed five attempts.

    Each failure visibly reduces their remaining opportunities.

    That creates an immediately understandable challenge for viewers.

    But it is a dramatic convention, not a reliable representation of how real nuclear weapons are secured or rendered safe.

    Real-world procedures depend on the particular device, its safety mechanisms, and specialized protocols.

    The series does not establish enough technical information to evaluate its fictional device as an authentic nuclear weapon system.

    What we can evaluate is the logic presented within the story.

    The interface allows only five attempts.

    The characters know those attempts are limited.

    The expert uses two before Sartaj discovers the Kaal Granth connection.

    Within those rules, the criticism makes sense.

    Even if the device itself is fictionalized, its established constraints should still influence the characters’ decisions.

    The scene becomes frustrating when the characters appear to disregard those constraints.

    Did the Writers Intentionally Make the Scientist Look Incompetent?

    There is no verified statement from the writers establishing that the scientist was deliberately written as incompetent.

    We should not claim that the character was intentionally humiliated or made foolish to elevate Sartaj.

    However, we can examine the dramatic effect of the scene.

    The expert fails.

    The technical team cannot solve the puzzle.

    The other investigators evacuate.

    Sartaj remains behind.

    He discovers the connection between the bomb and the Kaal Granth.

    He then makes the final choice alone.

    This structure transfers the story’s decisive moment from the technical specialists to its central protagonist.

    Sartaj becomes the person whose knowledge, family history, and judgment determine the ending.

    The two early failures intensify that transfer.

    They leave him with fewer opportunities.

    They make every subsequent input more consequential.

    And they ensure that his final choice carries maximum emotional weight.

    The scene clearly serves the dramatic purpose of isolating Sartaj as the final decision-maker.

    Whether that purpose justified the questionable behavior of the specialist is a matter of interpretation.

    The show could have achieved a similar effect by giving her two evidence-based attempts that failed.

    Instead, it leaves her reasoning unexplained.

    That choice invites criticism.

    The Strongest Defense of the Scientist

    The fairest defense combines three observations.

    First, she is working under extreme pressure.

    Second, the correct code is unknown.

    Third, Sartaj’s potential solution has not yet been established.

    From her perspective, she may believe that the available options are to attempt something or allow the countdown to continue.

    She also uses only two of the five attempts.

    She does not exhaust the entire allowance.

    That preserves opportunities for someone else to act.

    These details make her behavior more understandable.

    But they do not fully resolve the criticism.

    If she has a reason for choosing those patterns, the episode does not communicate it.

    If she has no reason, using limited attempts is difficult to defend.

    And if the team is still gathering information, preserving those attempts could have been valuable.

    The strongest conclusion is therefore not that she must have been incompetent.

    It is that the scene fails to show enough of her reasoning to make her actions convincing.

    That is a criticism of the storytelling as much as the character.

    The Bigger Plot Hole: Why Was the Team So Unprepared?

    The scientist’s choices are only one part of a larger problem.

    By the time the authorities reach the bomb, the investigation has uncovered a conspiracy involving Guruji, his followers, Gaitonde, and Shahid Khan.

    The danger to Mumbai is no longer hypothetical.

    Yet the team arrives without a confirmed way to disable the device.

    They have no verified pattern.

    They lack access to the person who activated it.

    And they appear unable to coordinate the information needed to identify the correct code before the countdown becomes critical.

    Some of this is inevitable in a thriller.

    The characters must face uncertainty.

    The antagonist must retain an advantage.

    And the final confrontation must be difficult.

    But the finale’s suspense depends heavily on preventable-looking failures.

    The specialist’s unexplained guesses.

    The late discovery of the Kaal Granth connection.

    The lack of a clear plan for the security interface.

    And the final reliance on Sartaj’s personal judgment.

    Together, these choices make the sequence feel less like a professional emergency response and more like a deliberately constructed puzzle.

    That does not invalidate the emotional meaning of the ending.

    It does explain why viewers continue to question its practical logic.

    Why This Plot Hole Matters to the Ending

    The nuclear countdown is supposed to bring together the series’ central themes.

    Sartaj’s relationship with his father.

    Guruji’s ideology.

    The corruption surrounding Mumbai.

    Gaitonde’s role in the conspiracy.

    And the question of whether the city deserves or can achieve salvation.

    The final pattern is meant to carry all of that significance.

    But the scientist’s earlier guesses draw attention away from the symbolism.

    Instead of concentrating on Dilbagh’s legacy, viewers begin calculating the number of attempts that were wasted.

    Instead of debating whether Sartaj has resisted Guruji’s philosophy, they ask why a specialist treated a nuclear threat like a phone-unlocking problem.

    This is the real cost of the scene.

    A practical inconsistency can distract from an otherwise powerful thematic conclusion.

    The writers wanted the final choice to be about Sartaj.

    For some viewers, it became about the expert who had already used two of his chances.

    Final Verdict: Why Did the Scientist Waste Two Attempts?

    The series never explicitly explains why the nuclear expert selected her two unsuccessful patterns.

    She is operating under extreme time pressure, without a confirmed code, and may believe that trying something is better than doing nothing.

    But the show does not establish that her choices are based on technical evidence or a known security procedure.

    That makes the criticism reasonable.

    The two attempts consume 40% of the available chances.

    They reduce Sartaj’s options when he later discovers the patterns in the Kaal Granth.

    And they create the impression that a trained specialist is guessing without a clear strategy.

    At the same time, it would be unfair to claim that the expert alone caused Mumbai’s destruction.

    The series never confirms that the bomb explodes.

    Nor does it establish that another two attempts would have produced the correct code.

    The most defensible interpretation is that the scene uses unexplained failures to increase suspense and make Sartaj’s final choice more consequential.

    But the price is credibility.

    The nuclear expert may have had reasons for her choices.

    The audience is never shown what they were.

    That is the real plot hole: not necessarily that the scientist guessed, but that the series asked viewers to trust her expertise without showing any evidence of it.


    Related Analysis on True Taste Korea

    Why Did Sartaj Choose His Father’s Pattern in Sacred Games? The Secret Hidden in the Kaal Granth

    Explore Dilbagh Singh’s connection to Guruji, the writer’s secret fail-safe theory, and why Sartaj’s final pattern may have been the key to saving Mumbai.


    Sources and Further Reading

    TTK Original — Beyond the Headlines

    Editorial note: The five-attempt limit, the expert’s two failed inputs, Sartaj’s use of the Kaal Granth, and the unresolved ending are established by the series and contemporary coverage. The expert’s actual reasoning is not confirmed; explanations involving panic, guesswork, or unshown technical knowledge remain interpretations.