Movies

  • Practical Magic 2 Was No. 1 at the Box Office—So Why Is Everyone Calling It a Disappointment?

    Sandra Bullock and Nicole Kidman returned for Practical Magic 2, more than two decades after the original movie became a cult favorite.

    And the sequel did something that sounds like an obvious success:

    It opened at No. 1 at the domestic box office.

    So why are some people in Hollywood already using the word “disappointing”?

    The answer reveals something strange about modern box-office success.

    Being No. 1 Doesn’t Always Mean You Had a Huge Weekend

    Practical Magic 2 topped the domestic box office, but its opening landed around the lower end of industry expectations.

    That creates the apparent contradiction.

    A movie can beat every other film playing that weekend and still perform below what a studio, theater owners or analysts expected from it.

    No. 1 measures who won the weekend.

    Expectations measure how much money people thought the winner should make.

    Those are two very different things.

    The Original Practical Magic Wasn’t a Giant Hit Either

    There is another reason the early verdict may be worth treating cautiously.

    The original Practical Magic, released in 1998, wasn’t initially remembered as a massive theatrical blockbuster.

    Its reputation grew later.

    The combination of Sandra Bullock, Nicole Kidman, witchcraft, romance and the relationship between the Owens sisters helped the movie develop a loyal following long after its theatrical run.

    That following is a major reason a sequel exists decades later.

    In other words, Practical Magic has already demonstrated that opening-weekend numbers don’t necessarily tell its entire story.

    So Is Practical Magic 2 Actually a Flop?

    Not based simply on the fact that its opening was below some expectations.

    The more important questions come next.

    Does the audience keep showing up after opening weekend?

    Does nostalgia bring older fans back while attracting younger viewers who discovered the original through streaming?

    And does the movie perform strongly enough internationally and later on digital and streaming platforms?

    Those answers will matter more than one weekend.

    For now, Practical Magic 2 has landed in an unusual position:

    It won the box office — while still being asked why it didn’t win by more.

    And maybe that’s the more interesting question.

    If finishing No. 1 can still be called disappointing, what does “box-office success” actually mean anymore?

  • Was Disney Too Greedy? Why Did Moana Get a Live-Action Remake After Only 10 Years?

    Disney waited 25 years to remake The Lion King.

    Beauty and the Beast waited 26.

    Aladdin waited 27.

    Then there’s Moana.

    Just 10 years.

    The original animated movie arrived in 2016, Moana 2 followed in 2024, and in 2026 Disney released essentially the same original story again — this time in live action.

    So the question many viewers are asking is obvious:

    Why did Disney remake a movie that still feels new?

    Was Moana Remade Earlier Than Other Disney Movies?

    Very much so.

    According to Franchise Entertainment Research, the average gap between a Disney animated movie and its live-action remake has been about 27 years.

    For Moana, it was only 10.

    That matters because nostalgia usually needs time.

    Parents who watched The Lion King as children could later take their own children to the remake.

    With Moana, many of the kids who loved the original are still kids or young adults themselves.

    There wasn’t much time to miss it.

    So Why Did Disney Do It?

    The simplest answer may be:

    Moana is incredibly valuable.

    Disney says the original has remained one of its most-streamed movies annually over the past five years.

    Then Moana 2 became a billion-dollar theatrical hit.

    From Disney’s perspective, this wasn’t an old franchise that needed revival.

    It was already hot.

    And Hollywood loves recognizable intellectual property because audiences already know the characters, songs and story.

    That’s generally less risky than asking people to fall in love with something completely new.

    But Did Disney Miscalculate?

    Possibly.

    The live-action Moana opened with only about $43 million domestically, despite costing roughly $250 million to produce.

    That’s a surprisingly weak start for such a famous Disney property.

    Box-office analysts pointed to a simple problem:

    Too much Moana, too quickly.

    The original is still constantly available on streaming.

    Moana 2 arrived only two years earlier.

    Then audiences were asked to pay for another version of the first movie.

    One analyst argued the remake arrived at least several years too early to benefit properly from generational nostalgia.

    Why Were Critics So Negative but Audiences Much Happier?

    Here’s where the story gets interesting.

    Rotten Tomatoes currently shows a huge divide:

    Critics: 33%
    Verified audience: 88%

    Critics frequently complained that the remake was too similar to the animated original.

    But families often praised exactly the same thing.

    They wanted Moana.

    They wanted Maui.

    They wanted the songs.

    They wanted the story their children already loved.

    In other words:

    What critics saw as pointless repetition, some families saw as familiarity.

    Reddit Reveals Disney’s Real Problem

    Online discussions repeatedly return to one question:

    Why watch a nearly identical remake when the better animated movie is already available?

    That’s probably the biggest problem with remaking a recent movie.

    Disney’s older remakes could sell audiences a forgotten childhood experience in a new form.

    Moana has never been forgotten.

    It’s still being watched.

    That’s a very different proposition.

    Then Why Keep Making Live-Action Remakes?

    Because when they work, they can make extraordinary amounts of money.

    Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, The Lion King and Lilo & Stitch all crossed $1 billion worldwide.

    That’s difficult for any studio to ignore.

    And Disney isn’t only selling movie tickets.

    A successful Moana keeps the characters alive across streaming, merchandise, theme parks, music and future movies.

    The film is one part of a much larger franchise.

    Was Moana a Warning to Disney?

    It might be.

    The lesson isn’t necessarily:

    “Stop making remakes.”

    The lesson may be:

    “Give people enough time to want one.”

    Disney assumed Moana was popular enough that audiences wouldn’t care about the unusually short 10-year gap.

    The weak opening suggests at least some viewers did.

    Perhaps nostalgia has one ingredient even Disney can’t manufacture.

    Time.


    Quick Answers

    Why did Disney remake Moana after only 10 years?
    Because Moana remains one of Disney’s strongest modern franchises, with enormous streaming popularity and a billion-dollar sequel.

    Was 10 years unusually fast for a Disney remake?
    Yes. The average gap between Disney animated originals and their live-action versions has been around 27 years.

    Did the live-action Moana flop?
    Its roughly $43 million domestic opening was significantly below expectations, especially given its reported $250 million production budget.

    Why did audiences like it more than critics?
    Many families enjoyed its faithfulness to the original, while critics often viewed that same similarity as the reason the remake was unnecessary.

    Why does Disney keep making live-action remakes?
    Successful Disney remakes have generated billions of dollars while extending valuable franchises across movies, streaming and merchandise.